There are many questions about the elephant postmortem report, but the answers are few: Experts say, how did the doctor know that life had been traumatized?

 There are many questions about the elephant postmortem report, but the answers are few: Experts say, how did the doctor know that life had been traumatized?

Controversy over the death of an elephant in the herd has escalated.  Questions have been raised about the circumstances under which the elephant died.  Dissatisfaction with the post-mortem report is growing.  The departmental minister is also silent on the death of the elephant.  When asked, the minister avoided the camera.

 Wildlife Week is underway in Nandankanan.  The leader is giving lengthy speeches to protect wildlife.  The Minister of Forests and Environment also spoke highly of the protection of wildlife.  But when asked about the elephant deaths in the community and the controversial post-mortem report, Minister Vikram Arukh avoided it.

The post-mortem report says the elephant died of a mental injury.  However, many experts believe that the elephant drowned.  It is alleged that the ambassador provided the information to Hussein.  According to the PCCF, the investigation into the elephant's death has not been completed.  There are still many reports to come.  Bhubaneswar and Anugul RCCF are investigating.  The PCCF said talks were also underway with the Water Resources Department

So the question arises

 Why didn't the minister open his mouth about the death of the elephant?

 Didn't the elephant die because of the negligence of the department?

 Is the amputation report being prepared?

 Is the cause of death a mental injury or something else?

 Was it psycho-therapy to know the elephant's mental state?

 If you have a heart attack, do you have any medical reports already?

 All these questions are worrying everyone.  Will the Forest Department or the Minister answer it?